An introvert is someone who is described as “a shy, reticent person,” which to me, is an over-generalization. Psychologist agrees with me on that point, and have been debating that definition for years. Carl Jung originally defined introversion as a focus on one’s “inwardly directed psychic energy,” and to me, that is a more accurate description than just saying someone is shy. In the 1930’s, a psychologist by the name of J.P. Guilford tried to measure Jung’s interpretation of introversion and found that there were multiple, distinct factors of introversion – making it a more complex character trait. In the 1960’s, Patricia Carrigan began to delve into the characteristics of introversion, and she said that when using the term “introvert”, “care must be taken to specify its conceptual and operational referent. What appear to be minor distinctions between the various conceptions may in fact be crucial ones.”
Then, in the 1990’s came to the “Big 5″ framework of personality: extraversion, neuroticism, agreeableness, consciousness, and intellect/imagination. Within the “Big 5″ framework, introversion is simply the opposite of extraversion. With the “Big 5″ framework being the predominant personality framework in modern psychology, the definition of an introvert is largely lost within the other personality frameworks. Being an introvert is not simply being the opposite of being an extravert.
Noted personality psychologist Jonathan Cheek says, “by invalidating the ordinary language meaning of introversion by defining it solely as the opposite of Big Five Extraversion, the Big Five researchers are guilty of Psychological Imperialism.”That is where Jennifer Odessa Grimes comes in. Under the advisement of Cheek, she wrote her master’s thesis that there are actually 4 different types of introversion: social, thinking, anxious, and restrained. Her STAR system is redefining how psychologist thinks of introversion, and challenging personality psychology standards.
Scott Barry Kaufman, the scientific director of The Imagination Institute in the Positive Psychology Center at the University of Pennsylvania, has put together a simplified version of the STAR test to see what type of introvert you might be. The basic definitions of the 4 types of introverts, according to introvertdear.com are as follows:
Social introversion is the closest to the commonly held understanding of introversion, in that it’s a preference for socializing with small groups instead of large ones. Or sometimes, it’s a preference for no group at all — solitude is often preferable for those who score high in social introversion. “They prefer to stay home with a book or a computer, or to stick to small gatherings with close friends, as opposed to attending large parties with many strangers,” Cheek said. But it’s different from shyness, in that there’s no anxiety driving the preference for solitude or small groups.
Thinking introversion is a newer concept. People with high levels of thinking introversion don’t share the aversion to social events people usually associate with introversion. Instead, they’re introspective, thoughtful, and self-reflective. “You’re capable of getting lost in an internal fantasy world,” Cheek said. “But it’s not in a neurotic way, it’s in an imaginative and creative way.” Think the dreamily imaginative Luna Lovegood, not the socially awkward Neville Longbottom, Cheek said, putting it into Harry Potter terms I, for one, am deeply familiar with.
Unlike social introverts, anxious introverts may seek out solitude because they feel awkward and painfully self-conscious around other people, because they’re not very confident in their own social skills. But, often, their anxiety doesn’t fade when they’re all alone. This kind of introversion is defined by a tendency to ruminate, to turn over and over in their minds the things that might or could or already have gone terribly wrong.