Do you believe in the thought that letting go of someone you love is the bravest thing one can do? Have you ever had to do this?
If you love somebody, set them free has got to be the epitome of good advice that NOBODY wants to follow. It seems counterintuitive to everything we have been taught about love–love is something we FIGHT for, we SUFFER with; “Ain’t no mountain high enough to keep me from you” and all that. Letting go seems a risky endeavor at best; most of us would no sooner release a dangerous criminal from prison than emancipate someone from what we believe are the safe and sound confines of our love.
Because love is ALWAYS a good thing, right? How can loving someone ever be equated to a “trap”?
As common as divorce has become in our society, it has been stigmatized to such a degree that most people feel very obligated to build a loud and messy case for their reasoning; unfortunately, this means that somebody (often both somebodies) gets cast in the role of villain. Divorce is still seen as the embodiment of “giving up” (especially when children are involved) and this makes what is already one of the most stressful experiences a human can go through feel like an indictment. Children are facing the permanent disruption of their family life; must they also be subjected to the notion that their parents are “failures”?
What if we could treat divorce with the same reverence we have for marriage?
Acknowledging the importance of this major life decision that obviously has not been made lightly and celebrating the potential for new life and new growth that will result? Respecting the bravery that is required for all endings and the courage that will be needed to move forward?
Want to know more about why divorce is not always a bad thing? Read 5 Situations When Divorce Is The Best Parenting Decision You Can Make
Letting go of a relationship that isn’t working not only makes sense, it is actually the most loving thing you can do.
It is acknowledging that both you and your partner deserve to be happy; it is shifting the energy of the relationship from obligation back to choice. We have been sold this idea that when we “commit” ourselves to one another, we no longer get to choose.
Richer, poorer, in sickness and in health…it is now predetermined that these will be endured together for as long as you both shall live. I think this actually STIFLES the love we feel for each other instead of enhancing it. It is far more evolved and romantic to start each day with the understanding that while we could choose differently, we actively choose each other over and over again.
Not because we HAVE to; because we want to.
This is not necessarily an argument AGAINST marriage; it is more definitively an argument FOR freedom. The “rules of love” seem to me to be a contradiction in terms. Rules are meant for maintaining an institution; agreements are the bedrock of mutual respect. Rules are rigid and confining; agreements are fluid and mutually agreeable. There is nothing more damaging to a love relationship than rigidity.
When we are flexible, the relationship can blossom instead of remaining tightly coiled.
There is something a bit tragicomic that the main argument against freedom in a romantic relationship is the belief that it would encourage infidelity. Even though I do not believe this is necessarily true, I am going to go out on a limb and say, “So what if it does?” If we accept the premise that infidelity is a symptom and not the cause of an unhealthy relationship, then what are we so afraid of?
Having to admit that we have an unhealthy relationship? Is it better to pretend otherwise? I sorry, this rationale seems crackers to me.